Sunday, September 28, 2008

Why one should read EULAs

From the skype EULA:
Skype, in its sole discretion, may modify or discontinue or suspend your ability to use any version of the Skype Software, and/or disable any Skype Software you may already have accessed or installed without any notice to you

What this means is that at any point in time, skype reserves the right to hit the self-destruct switch on the software on your computer, and there's not a damn thing you can do about it, because you allowed them to by using it. Furthermore, they reserve the right to change the rules at any time by posting said changes 30 days in advance on their website, so it's your problem to check their website regularly. And best of all, this whole transaction is subject to Luxembourg law, and if you want to sue Skype, presumably you have to do it in Luxembourg.

Thursday, August 21, 2008

The insanity that is VTA

The closer I look at the VTA (the local transit authority), the less I like it. The VTA seems singularly focused on wasting money in the most gratuitous way possible, getting the least bang for the most buck.

The epitome of this wastefulness is the BART extension project, which just never seems to go away. It's one of those things that seems like a good idea... until you think about it and realize that it's $6 billion and a 20 year delay for a subway from Fremont to San Jose,
through the middle of mostly nowhere. It's the same cost as LA's Subway to the Sea, and for two orders of magnitude less money, the VTA could have been running a commuter rail to Fremont or even Oakland, and in fact the VTA almost did before the BART project came along. But BART is still in the future, and only a relatively small amount of planning money has been spent on it.

The VTA has already wasted hundreds of millions of dollars on misguided projects, such as the light rail system. They sold their 15 year old fleet of 50 high-platform cars and bought a brand new fleet of 100 low-floor cars, despite needing at most 61 of them for peak service. And to allow level boarding with these new cars, they have had to raise the platforms at every single station in the system, at great expense, not to mention inconvenience to passengers when the
stations are closed.

And the design of the light rail system as a whole just seems wasteful: it doesn't really go where people want to go, and it takes a long time getting there. Just look at the absurd shape of the line from Downtown to Alum Rock via Milpitas. Or the long, scenic, and slow windings of the Mountain View line through office-park-land. Or the sidewalk running through Downtown at 10 mph, which makes trips through San Jose infeasibly slow. Or how the single busiest transit corridor in the county, along Santa Clara St and Alum Rock Ave, still doesn't
have light rail service.

Thursday, August 14, 2008

Trains and scalability

What with the high gas prices, it's not surprising that even in LA, public transit ridership has been setting records this year. What's particularly interesting about this latest set of numbers, though, is that the Gold Line's ridership has finally exceeded that of the Orange Line busway, and the Orange Line's growth is starting to stagnate. There's a very simple explanation: the Orange Line has basically reached capacity, since it's going to be hard to maintain reliable service with headways closer than four minutes. On the Gold Line, they've gone from 12 minute peak headways down to 7.5. Plus, thanks to the ability to couple trains, as well as the higher speed that comes with proper grade crossing protection, the Gold Line requires 11 drivers to operate peak service, while the Orange Line requires about 24, for a roughly comparable number of passenger miles.
And the Gold Line has quite a bright future ahead of it, as higher ridership leads to a more frequent and thus more attractive service. The Eastside extension can only help matters, by linking more destinations with the rail network. With some upgrades to the power system, they will be able to start running three car trains and boost capacity by another 50% with no extra drivers, and I suspect that headways as close as 5 minutes are possible as well, more than doubling the line's capacity.
Meanwhile, the Orange Line is already running a bus every four minutes at peak, and it's not likely that service can increase much beyond that without creating jams at the many grade crossing on the line. So the buses will get increasingly crowded until an equilibrium is reached between people needing to get somewhere, and people not wanting to put up with the crowding. Or until the line is rebuilt as light rail.

Thursday, August 7, 2008

Yet another Bush Administration WTF

The Federal Transit Administration recently made a ruling that expands the definition of charter bus service to keep publicly funded transit agencies from competing with charter bus companies when they provide premium fare service, like to football games. However, this isn't really a charter service organized and paid for by one person, rather, it's a special transit service, with the bus company doing the organizing and each rider paying an individual fare into the farebox. And according to California regulations, this makes it legally a transit service, not a charter service, and a license to operate charter service isn't enough to provide it, and it can only be operated by a transit provider. The end result might well be that nobody is allowed to operate this service at all. WTF.

Monday, July 28, 2008

Mixed-use development

These days with high gas prices and awful traffic, we are starting to hear more about mixed-use development, generally with terms like "urban villages" and such. The point seems to be that people can live next to where they work and have short commutes. But that is, for the most part, just wishful thinking, and entirely misses the point of being in a city, that being the access you have to a wide variety of jobs and leisure activities. A city is more than just a bunch of villages concatenated together.

No, the real point of mixed use development is just plain old efficiency. Things like raods, transit, and sewers are expensive to build, and they have to be built to meet the peak demand. The neat thing about mixed-use is that the peak demands of the uses generally come at different times, so the overall peak is only as big as that of the biggest use. If you've built roads and parking lots to support an office park, you can probably build a shopping mall next to it with only a little extra road capacity and parking, since the office park is empty on evenings and weekends, which is exactly when the shopping mall is full.

Monday, July 21, 2008

Carpets in subway car

I was reading some documents published by WMATA (which runs the Washington Metro) about their subway train fleet, and I learned an interesting fact: 15% of maintenance downtime is due to carpet replacements. I suspect this is slightly less bad for BART, but it's still pretty significant. No wonder both systems are looking for ways to get rid of carpets and save themselves money and maintenance headaches.

Another interesting fact is that 20% of in-service delays related to equipment failure are due to the ATC system. So maybe there's some advantage after all to having a nice simple mechanical train-stop system like NYC does: it's very, very reliable, and most light rail systems can get by just fine with no train-stop at all, just plain old block signals, again with much higher reliability since there's no carborne equipment to fail.

Tuesday, July 8, 2008

Automobile

I read a post on a forum on the topic of cars, and I think it is a wonderful demonstration of the sheer cognitive dissonance that is America's "love affair with the automobile".

Nothing will ever beat the private car for convenience. Its right there, whenever you want it. Its fast, it can be used by almost anyone, regardless of physical health. No wait times to use it, no sharing it with the smelly unbathed guy, the psycho homeless person, or the screaming infant. No stops along the way. And it can be used for trips of any length, to any location, without being forced to walk a mile from a bus stop to the destination. And depending on where you're driving, it can be quite pleasant- driving in the mountains with the top down is *fun*. I've never had a fun bus ride.


Apparently this person has never lived in a city, never had to walk a quarter mile across a parking lot, never had to sit in traffic for half an hour, never even stopped at a traffic light. He's never gotten drunk and been unable to drive, never been a teenager too young to drive or had a grandparent too old to drive safely.