Tuesday, July 6, 2010
The importance of frequent transit service
Thursday, May 20, 2010
Translink on Caltrain: so many frustrations
I've recently seen flyers stating that Translink will soon be the only form of payment accepted on Caltrain for monthly passes and zone upgrades. I feel that this is premature, and that there are a number of features Translink needs to have before it can match what is offered by the current Caltrain fare system. The main issues are zone upgrades, monthly pass activation, inter-agency transfers, and availability of vending machines.
First off, the availability of Translink vendors in the Caltrain service area is spotty at best. Right now, I can buy a monthly pass or 8-ride at any Caltrain station, whereas I can only do Translink transactions at the San Francisco or San Jose ticket offices during business hours, or at some Walgreens that are not necessarily near the stations, and may not necessarily even be willing to deal with Translink transactions (I'll file a separate complaint about the concrete cases of that). It would be nice to have Translink Add Value Machines installed at Caltrain stations, especially San Jose, but possibly also other popular stations such as Mountain View, Palo Alto, Redwood City, and Hillsdale.
The next issue is monthly pass activation. According to the brochure, when I buy a monthly pass for a given set of zones, such as 3-4, it is not activated until I tag on and off in the respective start and end zones, and that if I tag on and off in different zones, it will instead give me a pass for those zones (and I will be charged accordingly). This works great for someone who always travels between the exact same stations every time and never ventures anywhere else, but is a major inconvenience if I happen to be travelling to a different zone on the first day of the month. It means I either have to jump off the train at an intermediate stop to tag my pass, or else save the tagging of the pass for a different day and pay full fare, which seems incredibly unfair given that I've already paid for the pass.
On a related note, the handling of zone upgrades seems subpar. If I have a monthly pass, and wish to travel outside its zones, I have to buy a paper zone upgrade. If I do the intuitive thing and tag on and off, I get charged full fare, which is effectively charging me for something I already (mostly) paid for. Furthermore, in a comparable situation on AC Transit, it works the opposite way. If I have a local pass and wish to upgrade to a transbay ticket, I must use Translink e-cash to pay, not actual cash. This seems frustratingly inconsistent for a fare system that was supposed to provide some consistency among the Bay Area transit agencies. Also, with Translink, zone upgrades are no longer usable with 8-ride tickets.
Finally, there is the issue of broken interagency transfers. At San Jose, Caltrain connects to express buses operated by Monterey Salinas Transit and Santa Cruz Metro, neither of which are members of the Translink consortium. Both of these agencies provide discounts to holders of Caltrain monthly passes (in fact, MST provides free rides throughout its system). With the switch to exclusive use Translink as the medium for monthly passes, it will be impossible to provide these transfers unless MST and Highway 17 Express operators have the ability to read Translink cards.
I believe these issues need to be resolved before Translink can be made the exclusive form of fare media for monthly passes and 8-rides on Caltrain. I think Translink is a wonderful idea, and can be wonderfully convenient if implemented properly, but very frustrating if the implementation is half-baked. I hope these issues are addresses, because I'd very much like to see the Translink system succeed.
Wednesday, May 20, 2009
Privatization
The move to privatisation resulted in a massive loss of skill and expertise at all levels in the rail industry. In many cases, the people who were lost were the people who set the standards that form the basis of what is in place today. When these people moved on they took with them the
corporate memory which formed the decision making criteria of what was done and why. The corporate memory issue is further compounded by the disaggregation brought about by privatisation with no one body holding all the information.
So much for the idea that privatization always makes things more efficient. And this coming from a company that almost certainly benefited significantly from it. For more on this, see The Navigators, a movie about the impact of privatization on railway workers.
Tuesday, May 5, 2009
A pleasant surprise from the MBTA
By far the most ill-conceived transportation project in Boston was Phase 3 of the Silver Line, a proposal to link Phase 1 (a silver-painted bus down Washington St) to Phase 2 (the bus tunnel from South Station to the waterfront), for no particular reason that was obvious to anyone other than that these two completely unrelated projects were called "Silver Line". Building a bus tunnel would have cost over a billion dollars required tearing up part of the Boston Common and demolishing an out of service Green Line tunnel that coincidentally goes to the same general place, and has the advantages of being a train tunnel and already being there. And nobody ever made a very convincing case that there would be any significant ridership from Dudley to the South Boston Waterfront (as opposed to, say, Park Street). Well, there's some good news.
The MBTA and the state government have officially endorsed a different extension of the Silver Line, a much cheaper and more useful proposal to extend the Washington St. Silver Line to a surface terminal at South Station and convert the #28 bus into another Silver Line-branded bus rapid transit line. While still not ideal (doing both routes as Green Line branches would have been better), this project is at least both useful and within the means of the MBTA to actually build, and is a huge step in the right direction for the MBTA planning process. Now all they have to do is admit that light rail is in fact sometimes better than a bus :)